- Home
- About SRWP
- About the Watershed
- A Roadmap to Watershed Management
- Sacramento River Basin Report Card
- Cover and Acknowledgements
- Table of Contents
- List of Acronyms
- Executive Summary and Report Card
- 1.0 Introduction and Background
- 2.0 Indicator Selection
- 3.0 Indicator Generation, Evaluation, Aggregation
- 4.0 General Methods and Principles
- 5.0 Interpretation
- 6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
- Appendix A: Glossary of Terms
- Appendix B: Indicator Selection Criteria
- Watershed Map Maker
- Resource Library
- Invasive Plants
- On-Line Regulatory Permitting Guide
- Rural Residential Development
- Mercury
- Events
- Our Work
- News
2.0 Indicator Selection
Table of Contents

- 2.1.1 Cross-walk between goals and objectives and attribute categories
- 2.1.2 Correspondence between objectives and ecological condition indicators
2.2 Indicator selection criteria
2.4 Target and reference condition selection
Two complementary methods were used to select indicators to assess condition and trends. One was to use the WAF to select and organize indicators according to various ecological and social categories, for example landscape condition and economic condition. The other method was to find out about the goals and objectives stakeholders have for the watershed and use those to select and organize indicators. Ultimately, the report card was based on these watershed and regional goals and objectives.
