| |
|
|
Scenarios for 2050 using UPlan Model
Base Case Scenario — Detail
 Click for larger version
This is a view of the Sacramento watershed area in the year 2050, showing where development will occur if no changes in planning or development are made. It is used to compare with the other scenarios, which take into account possible effects from natural disasters or limited natural resources.
The current population and population projections are taken from the Department of Finance, 2007[*]. The persons per household figures are derived from the Census 2000 Summary File 1, State and County Summary table, as an average of owner-occupied and renter-occupied numbers. Employees per household numbers are taken from the Department of Finance 2006 county profiles.
Go to Discussion of this scenario
Model Specifics
| Group |
Population 2000 |
Population 2050 |
Persons per Household |
Employees per Household |
| 1 |
330,162 |
631,339 |
2.51 |
.83 |
| 2 |
344,295 |
925,817 |
2.64 |
.89 |
| 3 |
104,515 |
212,135 |
2.67 |
.72 |
| 4 |
692,331 |
1,395,136 |
3.51 |
1.12 |
| 5 |
1,679,776 |
3,310,329 |
2.61 |
1.26 |
| 6 |
92,532 |
136,113 |
2.45 |
.73 |
| 7 |
3,701 |
4,441 |
2.23 |
.59 |
| 8 |
1,261 |
10,413 |
2.39 |
.42 |
| Attractors |
Discouragers |
Masks |
| Census Blocks with Growth (All but Residential Very Low Estates) |
Vernal Pools (All but Residential Very Low Estates) |
Lakes |
| Highways (All but Residential Very Low Estates) |
California Natural Diversity Database (All but Residential Very Low Estates) |
Rivers and Streams |
| Ramps (All but Residential Very Low Estates) |
National Wetland Inventory (All but Residential Very Low Estates) |
Existing Urban |
| Existing Spheres of Influence (All but Residential Very Low Estates) |
FEMA 100 Year Floodplains |
Public Lands |
| Major Roads (All but Residential Very Low Estates) |
|
Sutter Buttes Area (Group 2 only) |
| Minor Roads (High and Low Density Commercial and Residential Very Low Estates only) |
|
|
| Highway 65 (Group 5 only) (All but Residential Very Low Estates) |
|
|
| City Attractor (Citrus Heights, Rocklin, Lincoln) (Group 5 only) (All but Residential Very Low Estates) |
|
|
| Group |
Uplan Land Use Class |
General Plan Class |
| 1 |
High Density Residential |
High Density Residential, Urban Reserve, Planned Development, Mixed Uses |
| Medium Density Residential |
Medium Density Residential, Urban Reserve, Planned Development, Mixed Uses |
| Low Density Residential |
Low Density Residential |
| Very Low Density Residential |
Agriculture, Low Density Residential, Very Low Density Residential |
| Very Low Density Residential Estates |
Agriculture, Low Density Residential, Very Low Density Residential |
| Industrial |
Industry, Urban Reserve |
| High Density Commercial |
High Density Commercial, Urban Reserve, Planned Development, Mixed Uses |
| Low Density Commercial |
Low Density Commercial, Urban Reserve, Planned Development, Mixed Uses |
| 2 |
High Density Residential |
High Density Commercial, Urban Reserve |
| Medium Density Residential |
Medium Density Residential, Urban Reserve |
| Low Density Residential |
Low Density Residential |
| Very Low Density Residential |
Agriculture, Low Density Residential, Very Low Density Residential |
| Very Low Density Residential Estates |
Agriculture, Low Density Residential, Very Low Density Residential |
| Industrial |
Industry, Urban Reserve |
| High Density Commercial |
High Density Commercial, Urban Reserve |
| Low Density Commercial |
High Density Commercial, Low Density Commercial, Urban Reserve |
| 3 |
High Density Residential |
High Density Residential, Urban Reserve, Planned Development, Mixed Uses |
| Medium Density Residential |
Medium Density Residential, Urban Reserve, Planned Development, Mixed Uses |
| Low Density Residential |
Low Density Residential |
| Very Low Density Residential |
Agriculture, Low Density Residential, Very Low Density Residential |
| Very Low Density Residential Estates |
Agriculture, Low Density Residential, Very Low Density Residential |
| Industrial |
Industry, Urban Reserve |
| High Density Commercial |
High Density Commercial, Urban Reserve, Planned Development, Mixed Uses |
| Low Density Commercial |
Low Density Commercial, Urban Reserve, Planned Development, Mixed Uses |
| 4 |
High Density Residential |
High Density Residential, Urban Reserve, Planned Development, Mixed Uses |
| Medium Density Residential |
Medium Density Residential, Urban Reserve, Planned Development, Mixed Uses |
| Low Density Residential |
Low Density Residential |
| Very Low Density Residential |
Agriculture, Low Density Residential, Very Low Density Residential |
| Very Low Density Residential Estates |
Agriculture, Low Density Residential, Very Low Density Residential |
| Industrial |
Industry, Urban Reserve |
| High Density Commercial |
High Density Commercial, Urban Reserve, Planned Development, Mixed Uses |
| Low Density Commercial |
Low Density Commercial, Urban Reserve, Planned Development, Mixed Uses |
| 5 |
High Density Residential |
High Density Residential, Urban Reserve, Planned Development |
| Medium Density Residential |
Medium Density Residential, Urban Reserve, Planned Development |
| Low Density Residential |
Low Density Residential |
| Very Low Density Residential |
Agriculture, Low Density Residential, Very Low Density Residential |
| Very Low Density Residential Estates |
Agriculture, Low Density Residential, Very Low Density Residential |
| Industrial |
Industry, Urban Reserve |
| High Density Commercial |
High Density Commercial, Urban Reserve, Planned Development |
| Low Density Commercial |
Low Density Commercial, Urban Reserve, Planned Development |
| 6 |
High Density Residential |
High Density Residential, Urban Reserve, Planned Development |
| Medium Density Residential |
Medium Density Residential, Urban Reserve, Planned Development |
| Low Density Residential |
Low Density Residential |
| Very Low Density Residential |
Agriculture, Low Density Residential, Very Low Density Residential |
| Very Low Density Residential Estates |
Agriculture, Low Density Residential, Very Low Density Residential |
| Industrial |
Industry, Urban Reserve |
| High Density Commercial |
High Density Commercial, Urban Reserve, Planned Development |
| Low Density Commercial |
Low Density Commercial, Urban Reserve, Planned Development |
| 7 |
High Density Residential |
Urban Reserve, Planned Development |
| Medium Density Residential |
Urban Reserve, Planned Development |
| Low Density Residential |
Agriculture, Very Low Density Residential |
| Very Low Density Residential |
Agriculture, Very Low Density Residential |
| Very Low Density Residential Estates |
Agriculture, Very Low Density Residential |
| Industrial |
Industry, Urban Reserve |
| High Density Commercial |
Urban Reserve, Planned Development |
| Low Density Commercial |
Urban Reserve, Planned Development |
| 8 |
High Density Residential |
High Density Residential, Planned Development |
| Medium Density Residential |
Medium Density Residential, Planned Development |
| Low Density Residential |
High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential, Planned Development, Very Low Density Residential |
| Very Low Density Residential |
Very Low Density Residential |
| Very Low Density Residential Estates |
Very Low Density Residential |
| Industrial |
Industry |
| High Density Commercial |
High Density Commercial, Planned Development |
| Low Density Commercial |
Industry, High Density Commercial, Low Density Commercial, Planned Development |
* There are 2 cases where we did not use the DOF population projections: Sierra county, which predicts a decrease in the number of people who will live there in 2050 from the year 2000 (we added 20% to the 2007 number to get to our 2050 number) and Alpine county. The DOF population for Alpine does not factor in development from vacation homes and ski resorts; however, Alpine county planners did establish an estimated "full occupancy" 2050 population based on full build out of existing specific plans and logical growth within the other settled areas.
|
|